

A hailstorm lasts minutes, yet it leaves thousands of damaged vehicles across a region. Roof, hood, fenders, doors: hundreds of dents per vehicle, in varying sizes and patterns.
For insurers, this is a stress test: thousands of claims at once, a massive challenge for claims management. Assessor capacity is designed for normal operations. After a hail event, backlogs build up that stretch across weeks. Customers wait for assessments, repair shops wait for approvals, claims settlement stalls.
The particular problem with hail damage: dents are often barely visible to the naked eye — a standard photograph is not enough for a reliable cost estimation. Specialized capture methods are required: hail scanners that systematically survey the vehicle surface, or trained personnel with so-called dent-mapping boards — reflection panels that make deformations in the bodywork visible.
Yet even once the dents are captured, the core challenge remains: an assessor must calculate the repair costs for each vehicle manually, dent by dent, damage by damage. With thousands of cases at the same time, this creates a bottleneck that lasts weeks.
Our brief: a solution that enables non-specialists to document damage and automates repair cost estimation — so insurers can settle claims in days instead of weeks after a hailstorm.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Assessor capacity is limited. Our client therefore relies on a gig-economy model: partner companies handle the structured on-site damage documentation. A process we developed together with assessors guides partners through the documentation efficiently and reliably.
Two capture methods are used:
Hail scanners: Drive-through scanners that automatically scan the vehicle and capture dents topographically. Data is transferred automatically to the AI system — panel, position, number, and size of each dent.
Dent-mapping boards: For manual capture, trained partners use dent-mapping boards — reflection panels that make even the finest deformations visible. Findings are recorded in a structured format in the AI system.
Based on this structured damage data, our machine learning model calculates the expected repair costs in milliseconds. The model considers all relevant factors: panel, manufacturer, vehicle type, material, and the number and size of dents.
A central AI system connects all steps: damage documentation, AI-based cost estimation, and report dispatch. Thousands of claims in parallel, with complete traceability.

The system has proven itself in practice: in 2022 alone, more than 40,000 hail damage claims were processed through the solution. Even in large-scale hail zones, backlogs were consistently prevented — the system scales with demand.
The impact on the internal organization is significant: claims processing requires at most one remote assessor, who reviews AI-generated cost estimates and dispatches approved reports. The combination of the gig-economy partner model and AI-based cost estimation makes claims management more resilient and more virtual: documentation on site, cost estimation by AI, review remote.
The combined ratio improves measurably, because process costs per claim decrease and cycle time from FNOL to payout is drastically shortened. The result: high customer satisfaction even during extreme weather phases — because settlement happens in days instead of weeks.
After a hailstorm, insurers need to calculate thousands of vehicle damages. Our machine learning model computes repair costs based on structured damage data: which panel is affected (roof, hood, fender, door), which manufacturer and vehicle type, which material, how many dents of what size. Based on this data, the model predicts the expected repair costs — in milliseconds.
Hail damage — especially fine dents — is barely visible in conventional photographs. The surface reflects too much; the deformations are too subtle. Instead, hail scanners are used to systematically survey the surface, or dent-mapping boards — reflection panels that make even the smallest dents visible to the human eye. Both methods produce structured, quantifiable data rather than images open to interpretation.
A dent-mapping board (also: reflection panel, PDR light panel) is a tool from the paintless dent repair trade. The panel is held next to the damaged area — the reflection on the paint surface reveals deformations that are barely perceptible to the naked eye. Trained partners use the dent-mapping board to systematically count, measure, and document dents in the claims management system.
Our AI-powered claims management system scales via a gig-economy partner model: external partner companies handle on-site hail damage documentation, guided by a structured process. Damage data — whether captured by hail scanner or dent-mapping board — flows into a central AI system. The AI model calculates repair costs in milliseconds. An internal assessor optionally reviews results remotely and dispatches the report. More than 40,000 cases were processed this way in 2022 alone.
In our AI-powered hail damage cost estimation system, external service providers handle on-site capture via the partner model — e.g. workshop staff, logistics partners, or other local workers. They do not need assessor qualifications: the structured capture process and standardized tools (hail scanners, dent-mapping boards) ensure data quality.
Our machine learning model for hail damage cost estimation was trained on historical claims data and considers all relevant factors: panel, manufacturer, vehicle type, material, and the number and size of dents. Prediction accuracy is 98%. Because input data is captured in a structured and consistent way, the model delivers reproducible results — unlike manual estimates that vary from assessor to assessor.
The AI-powered claims management system for hail damage improves the combined ratio through three levers: first, AI-based cost estimation reduces processing time per claim dramatically (milliseconds instead of hours). Second, a gig-economy partner model scales damage documentation without requiring additional internal headcount. Third, process costs decrease because at most one remote assessor is needed for review and approval.
The ML model for hail damage cost estimation accounts for manufacturer-specific factors such as materials, panel geometry, and repair methods. It was trained on a broad vehicle spectrum and can be extended to new manufacturers and models as soon as corresponding damage data becomes available.
PLAN D designed, developed, and deployed the AI-powered claims management system for hail damage: from the gig-economy partner model to the structured capture process to the machine learning model for repair cost prediction. We designed the architecture, trained the ML model, built the AI system, and continue to operate and evolve the system.
Yes — hail damage to vehicles falls under comprehensive insurance. This is relevant for insurers because after a hail event, thousands of comprehensive-coverage claims arrive simultaneously. Exactly this mass scenario is what our AI-powered claims management system addresses: fast, standardized cost estimation instead of weeks of individual assessments.
Zukunft beginnt, wenn menschliche Intelligenz künstliche Intelligenz entwickelt. Der erste Schritt ist nur ein Klick.
Zukunft beginnt, wenn menschliche Intelligenz künstliche Intelligenz entwickelt. Der erste Schritt ist nur ein Klick.